Summary of End of Year Reflection Questions

In class, we filled out a sheet with question about our experiences in science class this year (and possibly your experiences in previous years with our teacher, Mrs. M, depending how you interpret the questions.) We had a substitute teacher, so I'm not 100% sure what we are supposed to do, but I think that I should write a summary of what I wrote on that sheet.
I don't remember everything I wrote on the paper, so I'll type what I remember.
One of the questions I distinctly remember was along the lines of "What are some of your memorable experience in science class?". I chose to talk about both 6th and 7th grade, because I'm leaving ISB, so I think about science class as a whole 2-year experience, not as two 1-year experiences. I wrote that one of my most memorable experiences in science class was the marble theme park that I did with Luka and David last year. I remember that because it was very stressful for me, and I didn't end up doing very well in the end.
Another question I remember on the paper was "Which was your favorite unit this year?" and I answered by talking about the ultimate survival unit. I chose that as my favorite because it was different than a normal unit.
An additional and final question that I remembered was "What was your least favorite unit this year?" which I answered with "the space unit." I chose that because I thought that the space unit was a bit rushed at the end of the year and I'm not interested in space in general.

Make an Impact Lab

Guiding Question: What are the factors that affect the appearance of impact craters?
My Hypothesis: I think that the mass, speed and angle of the meteor affect the appearance of impact craters because they affect how deep the floor of the crater is and how far the walls of the crater are from each other.
Materials:

• Safety goggles
• tray
• flour
• notebook
• spoon
• small and large marbles
• ruler (cm)
• Excel
• Word

I performed these tests with my lab partners, Brin, Ergi and Jan, and here are our results:

And from that data I produced these graphs:

Data Analysis:
This is a lot of data when you look at it. Analyzing it wasn't easy. I found that it was much easier to see trends in the graphs, rather than the raw data.
From what I see in my graphs, I can tell that the length of the eject is most affected by the height of drop. In our miniaturized version of Earth and meteors, the height of the drop also affected speed, so I can say that the speed that the meteor is falling has a great impact on the length of the ejecta from the collision. I can also see that the faster the meteor is falling when it hits earth, the deeper the crater will be. The speed of the meteor has a significant impact on the depth of the crater. An additional observation that I can make from my data and charts is that the speed of the meteor does not have a large impact on the diameter of the crater. That logically makes sense. Even when the meteor is falling extremely fast, it can't leave a crater that is all that much  bigger than the meteor itself.
Conclusion: My guiding question was "What are the factors that affect the appearance of impact craters?". Through my testing, I found that the speed of the meteor has a significant impact on the depth the crater and length of the resulting ejecta, but the speed does not have a significant impact on the diameter of the crater. My hypothesis was inaccurate because it didn't relate to the testing that I did. So I guess it counts as "incorrect."

Satellites Lab

TITLE:  Satellites in Orbit Lab

I.  GUIDING QUESTION: How does the mass as well as the distance from earth impact how a satellite stays in orbit?

II.HYPOTHESIS:

Adrian’s Hypothesis:
I think that the heavier the satellite, as well as the further from earth it is, (the longer the string is) the more inertia the satellite has and the longer it will stay in orbit.

Exploration (PLAN & DO A TEST):
         Materials:

1. 3x String or Fishing Wire (one that is 40 cm, one that is 80cm, and one that is 140cm)
2. Metal Rings
3. Ruler
4. Notebook

Variables:
Manipulated:

• Mass of satellite
• Distance of satellite from gravity source

Constant:

• Force of gravity

Adrian’s and Rafa’s Procedure:

1. Tape together the amount of metal rings you are testing (1, 2, 3 or 4).
2. Then securely tie the bundle of metal rings to the string length that you are testing. (40, 80, or 140) You have now made a pendulum.
3. Swing the pendulum above your head at a constant rate.
4. Observe in a data table how well the pendulum swings at different strengths.

Maria’s Procedure:

1. Take the fishing line and loop it through the holes of the four metal.
2. Securely tie the string.
3. Slowly start swinging the pendulum, raising it up above your head.
4. Write down your observations, changing the mass of the pendulum (1-4 metal rings) and the length of the string (40cm- 80cm-120cm-160cm )

Observations

	1 weight	2 Weights	3 Weights	4 Weights
40 cm string	It was light, easy to spin fast, if it were a planet it wouldn’t have much gravity. It hung down slightly, which wouldn’t have happened with more weights.	Much harder to swing, would have more gravity as  a planet. Was basically level as it swung.	Was actually easier to swing because inertia kept it in motion	Maria’s arm started to swing, slightly harder to swing than 3 weights but easier than 2 weights.
80 cm string	Actually quite easy to swing. Observed that the longer the string and the smaller the mass, the easier it is to swing	Heavier, you can feel the slight weightiness.	“It’s heavy.” It wants to fly away. “Like the two ring, but heavier.”	“Ow! It hurts!” Very powerful inertia. If you tried changing directions, it would take longer.
140 cm string	Takes less power to swing. Feels really light.Extreme inertia, cannot switch directions.	Very resistant to change, has a lot of energy	Very very powerful.	Takes a lot of power to swing. Tilts more.

Adrian’s Data Analysis
In this lab, the amount of rings being tested represented the mass of the satellite, and the length of the string represented how far from Earth the satellite is. (I felt that I didn’t make that clear enough, which could have led to some misunderstandings.) I think that our data clearly shows that the heavier the weight is, the more inertia it has and the longer it would stay in orbit if it were a satellite. However, the length of the string had an even bigger effect on the inertia and longer string gave the weights, or “satellite” much more inertia. it relied on Our data mostly showed accuracy, but it relied on written observations rather than measurements. Because observations are subjective, the results could vary from person to person, which creates some inaccuracy.

Adrian’s Conclusion:
My guiding question was “How does the mass as well as the distance from earth impact how a satellite stays in orbit?” I concluded that the longer the  distance of the satellite from earth and the larger the mass of the satellite was, the more inertia it has and the longer it could stay in orbit. That is pretty much what I hypothesized, so my hypothesis is correct.


Adrian’s Further Inquiry:
The validity of our data was not so great this lab because all of our data was simply observations rather than measurements. That means that if someone else tried to replicate this lab, they would probably have a different-looking data table with different comments. However, the data was accurate enough for me to find clear patterns and determine the meaning from our results. If I were to do this lab again, I would be more scientific in swinging the pendulum at exactly the same speed in each test, and I would find some way to measure the results in addition to the comments.

Current Events - Furthest Object Ever Seen

On April 29, 2011, NASA's Swift satellite spotted a gamma ray burst. It turned out to be a very important gamma burst indeed. Named GRB 090429B, the gamma burst is 13.14 billion light years from earth. The universe is only 13.7 billion years old anyway, so finding an even older object will be difficult. When the gamma ray burst occurred, the universe was 1/10 of the size it is now, and 1/25 of its current age. Apparently the burst of gamma rays spawned in one of the earliest galaxies that existed in our universe. Unfortunately our current observatories and telescopes can't see that galaxy, but it's possible that future ones will be able to. It's also possible that this isn't actually the furthest object ever seen, because accuracy in measurement is difficult when the object is so far.
I find this interesting. I'm sure that astronomers will probably find a further object before long, but it's interesting to know that we as humans can see things that happened 13.14 billion years ago, long before we or even earth existed. It makes me feel like humans are more powerful than the universe, that we can observe things that we took no part in. This all very interesting, but I also don't think that it is very useful. It doesn't help us solve our problems, and so far it hasn't led to any significant discoveries about the creation of the universe.